「案例(li)」 1995年(nian)2月24日(ri)，甲(jia)建(jian)(jian)筑公(gong)(gong)司與(yu)乙(yi)(yi)(yi)廠(chang)就(jiu)乙(yi)(yi)(yi)廠(chang)技(ji)(ji)術改造工(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)簽(qian)訂(ding)建(jian)(jian)設工(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)合(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)。合(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)約定(ding)：甲(jia)公(gong)(gong)司承(cheng)擔乙(yi)(yi)(yi)廠(chang)技(ji)(ji)術改造工(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)項(xiang)(xiang)目(mu)56項(xiang)(xiang)，負責承(cheng)包(bao)(bao)各(ge)項(xiang)(xiang)目(mu)的(de)土(tu)建(jian)(jian)部分；承(cheng)包(bao)(bao)方式按預算(suan)定(ding)額包(bao)(bao)工(gong)(gong)包(bao)(bao)料，竣工(gong)(gong)后辦理工(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)結(jie)算(suan)。合(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)簽(qian)訂(ding)后，甲(jia)公(gong)(gong)司按合(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)的(de)約定(ding)完(wan)成(cheng)該工(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)的(de)各(ge)土(tu)建(jian)(jian)項(xiang)(xiang)目(mu)，并(bing)于(yu)1996年(nian)11月14日(ri)竣工(gong)(gong)。孰料，乙(yi)(yi)(yi)廠(chang)于(yu)1996年(nian)9月被丙(bing)(bing)公(gong)(gong)司兼并(bing)，由(you)丙(bing)(bing)公(gong)(gong)司承(cheng)擔乙(yi)(yi)(yi)廠(chang)的(de)全(quan)部債權債務，承(cheng)接(jie)乙(yi)(yi)(yi)廠(chang)的(de)各(ge)項(xiang)(xiang)工(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)合(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)、借款(kuan)合(he)(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)及(ji)各(ge)種(zhong)協(xie)議。甲(jia)公(gong)(gong)司在(zai)工(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)竣工(gong)(gong)后多次催促(cu)丙(bing)(bing)公(gong)(gong)司對工(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)進(jin)行驗(yan)收并(bing)支付所欠工(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)款(kuan)。丙(bing)(bing)公(gong)(gong)司對此一直置之不(bu)理，既不(bu)驗(yan)收已竣工(gong)(gong)工(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)。也不(bu)付工(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)款(kuan)。甲(jia)公(gong)(gong)司無奈將丙(bing)(bing)公(gong)(gong)司訴至法院。

　　法院判決丙公(gong)司對已完工的土建(jian)項目進行驗收，驗收合格后(hou)向甲公(gong)司支付(fu)所欠工程(cheng)款。

　　「案例評析(xi)」此(ci)案簽訂建(jian)(jian)設(she)工(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)承包合(he)(he)同(tong)的(de)(de)是甲公司(si)與乙(yi)(yi)(yi)廠(chang)，但乙(yi)(yi)(yi)廠(chang)在被丙公司(si)兼并后，丙公司(si)承擔了乙(yi)(yi)(yi)廠(chang)的(de)(de)全部債權債務并承接(jie)(jie)了乙(yi)(yi)(yi)廠(chang)的(de)(de)各(ge)項工(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)合(he)(he)同(tong)，當(dang)然應(ying)(ying)當(dang)履行原甲公司(si)與乙(yi)(yi)(yi)廠(chang)簽訂的(de)(de)建(jian)(jian)設(she)工(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)承包合(he)(he)同(tong)，對已(yi)完工(gong)(gong)(gong)的(de)(de)工(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)項目進(jin)行驗(yan)(yan)收(shou)(shou)(shou)，驗(yan)(yan)收(shou)(shou)(shou)合(he)(he)格無質(zhi)量爭(zheng)議(yi)的(de)(de)，應(ying)(ying)當(dang)按照合(he)(he)同(tong)規定(ding)向甲公司(si)支付工(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)款(kuan)，接(jie)(jie)收(shou)(shou)(shou)該工(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)項目，辦理(li)交接(jie)(jie)手(shou)續。根(gen)(gen)據《合(he)(he)同(tong)法》第二百七十九條(tiao)規定(ding)：“建(jian)(jian)設(she)工(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)竣(jun)工(gong)(gong)(gong)后，發包人(ren)應(ying)(ying)當(dang)根(gen)(gen)據施工(gong)(gong)(gong)圖紙及(ji)說(shuo)明(ming)書、國家(jia)頒發的(de)(de)施工(gong)(gong)(gong)驗(yan)(yan)收(shou)(shou)(shou)規范和質(zhi)量檢驗(yan)(yan)標(biao)準及(ji)時進(jin)行驗(yan)(yan)收(shou)(shou)(shou)。驗(yan)(yan)收(shou)(shou)(shou)合(he)(he)格的(de)(de)，發包人(ren)應(ying)(ying)當(dang)按照約定(ding)支付價(jia)款(kuan)。并接(jie)(jie)收(shou)(shou)(shou)該建(jian)(jian)設(she)工(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)。”“建(jian)(jian)設(she)工(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)竣(jun)工(gong)(gong)(gong)經(jing)驗(yan)(yan)收(shou)(shou)(shou)合(he)(he)格后，方可交付使用(yong)；未經(jing)驗(yan)(yan)收(shou)(shou)(shou)或者驗(yan)(yan)收(shou)(shou)(shou)不合(he)(he)格的(de)(de)，不得交付使用(yong)。” 因此(ci)，法院(yuan)的(de)(de)判(pan)決是正確的(de)(de)。